The Climate Jig is Up

-A A +A
By Bill Claiborne


Jacques Chirac, former president of France, once called global warming “humanity dancing on a volcano.”  Well, that volcano has now erupted into one gigantic fraud thanks to the leaked e-mails coming from the Climate Research Unit, (CRU), in Great Britain- a facility which has been the primary source for all global warming data.

This development is just in time for the Copenhagen convention meeting this week that will attempt to impose a radical global treaty limiting the use of carbon-based energy.  The 15,000 delegates using 1,200 limos and 140 private jets will produce a carbon footprint equal to the size of several small countries. They will be working to implement what they call “global governance” that basically amounts to an assault on capitalism under the guise of saving the planet.

But what if the only heat in global warming is the cooking of the books to manipulate the so-called evidence?

The University of East Anglia maintains the CRU and in recent days their computers suffered a breach in security revealing the hoax of the century; global warming is indeed a fabricated crisis.  This should finish off the debate since there had already been a growing trend against the global warming hysteria. A recent Rasmussen poll, taken before these devastating revelations, showed 59 percent of Americans already skeptical of global warming science.

In 2000, Chirac indirectly related the true motive behind the deception when he said, “Cap and trade is the first component of an authentic global governance.”  Al Gore agrees, “It is the awareness itself [of climate change] that will drive the change. And one of the ways it will drive the change is through global governance and global agreements.”

Therefore, once you remove any authentic evidence for global warming, the only thing left is global governance and the loss of U.S. sovereignty.  So, the net result is a new political entity to govern the world irrespective of environmental problems, real or imagined. Does this sound oddly like the old Communist game plan?  It should.  But don’t take my word for it, listen to Czech President Vaclav Klaus:

“They [the global warmists] do not want to reveal their true plans and ambitions to stop economic development and return mankind several centuries back.  The idea of global warming is an excellent political idea. You must compare communism with the ideology of global warming alarmism…they are structurally very similar. They are against individual freedom, they are in favor of centralistic masterminding of our faiths, they are both very similar in telling us what to do, how to live, how to behave, what to eat, how to travel, what we can do, what we cannot do, and so on.”

Why would so-called, legitimate scientists participate in this propaganda?  The answer-  follow the money.

The Wall Street Journal reported that the University of East Anglia's CRU could barely make ends meet for most of the years since it was founded in 1972. This all changed in 1994 when the U.N.’s climate change convention came into being. This was the beginning of large government grants to finance global warming research.

Phil Jones, the director of the CRU, received $19 million worth of research grants between 2000 and 2006. This was a sixfold increase over the previous decade. Michael Mann, another prominent figure named in the e-mails, helped Penn State University obtain an additional $35 million per year for their environmental research.

It turns out, the only consensus for global warming is the one that’s paid for. There are currently 31,000 American scientists who have signed the Petition Project that refutes the bogus claims of global warmists.

Carol Browner was President Obama’s choice for Global Warming Czar.  The Washington Times reported that she was “listed as one of 14 leaders of a socialist group’s Commission for a Sustainable World Society, which calls for ‘global governance’ and says rich countries must shrink their economies to address climate change.”

Establishing a new, global government that would usurp our Constitution for a crisis that doesn’t exist is something that concerns even Democratic Sen. Jim Webb.  He wrote a letter to Obama warning that “only specific legislation agreed upon in the Congress, or a treaty ratified by the Senate, could actually create such a commitment [as proposed by Copenhagen] on behalf of our country.”

We should all pray that the truth prevails. If not, get ready for global redistribution of wealth under a ruling class of unaccountable Elitists who have no respect for honesty, freedom or individual rights. More hope and change. Send comments to: WFC83197@aol.com, or mail to: POB 114, Jacksboro, TN  37757.